IA Library · Page pattern · Reasoned, not built
Team and person pages
“Who will I actually deal with, and can I check them?”
Its action: Book with this person when people are chosen; otherwise none on the team list.
RequiredConditional on the briefCommon, not requiredLeft out for this briefYour content
Used by
Why this pattern works2 statements · 0 sourced · 0 untested or unknown · thin evidence
How sure we are
Worked out from research and real briefs. No site has been built from it yet, so treat it as reasoning to check, not a tested template.
Thin evidence: Per-person pages rest on our reasoning; only the directory itself is well evidenced.
What it answers
Its job Replace “a firm” with named people the visitor can recognize, verify and choose.
Use it when
- Clients pick or meet a named person: clinicians, solicitors, barbers, the engineer who turns up.
- NN/g: real employee photos build trust; stock photography and corporate speak erode it.
- People hold personal registrations clients are told to check.
Not when
- A sole trader: one person goes in “who we are” on the home page.
- Staff change often and nobody will keep the page current. A wrong name is worse than none.
What the research says
- Named people were asked for in 36 of the 118 briefs we studied. Whether each person needs a page of their own is not evidenced; the list alone may do.
Common mistakes
- Credentials as unexplained letters after a name, with no register number or link.
What changes with the brief
| Do clients care which person they get? Yes, they pick or meet a named person | One page per person, with “book with”. |
|---|---|
| Do clients care which person they get? The team matters, not who | The index only; no per-person pages. |