# Heritage — style guide for coding agents

> Generated from the Aesthetary record for **Heritage**.
> Research: **Partly sourced** · Build guidance: recorded in 8 of 8 research dimensions.
> 1 source attached.

## How to use this

Paste this file into your agent as context before asking it to design or build something in this visual language. It states what is established, what is our interpretation, and what nobody has established. Treat all three differently.

**The most important section is "Not researched yet".** Its purpose is to stop you and your agent inventing rules that sound right and are not recorded anywhere.

## What this language is

**Defining:** Armorial device or seal, founding date, engraved illustration, deep navy or burgundy

**Recognise it by:** A crest, seal or monogram device set with strict symmetry above a founding date, engraved or line-illustrated imagery in place of photography, and a deep saturated ground — navy, burgundy, forest — carrying traditional serif capitals with generous letterspacing. The diagnostic element is the date: it is the only device in the register that does the arguing, and everything else exists to make it credible. Gilded shares the symmetry and the dark ground but puts gold itself forward as the proposition and never dates itself. Institutional shares the navy and the conservatism but argues from present authority — a headshot grid and dense navigation — rather than from duration.

**Family:** Luxury & Refined
**Era:** 19th-century, contemporary

**Scope:** The visual register of heritage branding: armorial device or seal, founding date, engraved imagery, deep grounds, as Aesthetary's reading. 'Heritage' names inherited legacy, not a look; no source yet evidences this register.

## What it is arguing

Duration is the argument. An institution that has survived a long time has been tested, so the design's job is to make continuity visible and to look as though it has been in use longer than it has.

**It refuses:** Refuses novelty, visible trend, and any treatment that would date the work to its year of making.

## What it is not

Commonly confused with these. Getting the difference right matters more than getting the surface right:

- Letterpress
- Gilded
- Institutional

## Established rules

Grouped by what kind of claim each is. A requirement of the language and our own interpretation are not interchangeable.

**How to read each rule.** Every rule states two separate things, and neither stands in for the other:

- **Kind of claim** (the heading): From our catalogue entry · From our catalogue entry · disputed · Our reading · Documented · Source attached.
- **Evidence** (how it is established): Graded by our research brief · No source attached (`DOCUMENTED`) · From our catalogue entry (`SUPPORTED`) · Our reading (`CURATORIAL`) · Not researched yet (`UNKNOWN`) · No grade recorded (no grade in the record). Where a claim has its own canonical label, the Evidence line gives that label instead of the grade.
- **Product area**: which of the twelve areas the rule belongs to (Layout, Typography, Color, Imagery, Surface, Interface, Motion, Motif, Technique, Form, Hierarchy, Density), mapped from its raw area label in bold. "Context" means the rule is about the Aesthetic (its name, origin, lineage) rather than a part of the design. "Not mapped" means the raw area has no single area yet.
- The code in brackets is the `grade` field at `implementationConstraints.tokenRules.value.rules[].provenance.grade` in https://aesthetary.com/data/heritage.json. "From our catalogue entry" means: Stated in Aesthetary’s existing catalogue entry. An outside source is named only where one is linked to the claim.

### From our catalogue entry

_Carried over from Aesthetary's original catalogue entry. The reasoning behind it was never recorded._

- **typography** — Typography: traditional serif caps.
  - Kind of claim: From our catalogue entry · Evidence: From our catalogue entry · Product area: Typography
- **color** — Colour: deep navy or burgundy; engraved linework.
  - Kind of claim: From our catalogue entry · Evidence: From our catalogue entry · Product area: Color
- **imagery** — Imagery: engraving, not photography.
  - Kind of claim: From our catalogue entry · Evidence: From our catalogue entry · Product area: Imagery

### From our catalogue entry · disputed

_Carried over from Aesthetary's original catalogue entry. The reasoning behind it was never recorded._

- **form / motif / surface / technique** — Form / motif / surface / technique: crest/seal; engraving.
  - Kind of claim: From our catalogue entry · disputed · Evidence: From our catalogue entry · disputed · Product area: not mapped

### Our reading

- **layout** — Symmetry about a central axis, because symmetry is the cheapest available signal of permanence and the crest device already demands it. We do not claim Heritage requires a symmetrical grid. We claim it uses a crest and a date; the axis is our reading.
  - Kind of claim: Our reading · Evidence: Our reading · Product area: Layout
- **hierarchy** — Rank by centrality and enclosure — the crest sits highest because it is centred and framed, not because it is largest.
  - Kind of claim: Our reading · Evidence: Our reading · Product area: Hierarchy
- **density** — Generous and unhurried. Crowding reads as commercial urgency, which contradicts duration.
  - Kind of claim: Our reading · Evidence: Our reading · Product area: Density
- **motion** — Minimal to none. Motion dates a page to its year of making, which the negation explicitly refuses. This is a case where the correct native behaviour is almost no behaviour, and saying so is a real art-direction instruction rather than an absence.
  - Kind of claim: Our reading · Evidence: Our reading · Product area: Motion
- **device** — The founding date is the load-bearing device. It is the only element that makes the continuity claim, and without it the register is generic traditional styling.
  - Kind of claim: Our reading · Evidence: Our reading · Product area: not mapped

## Found in research

What research established from sources Aesthetary opened and checked. Each line names its area, how it is known, and where it is scoped. "Seen in the work" means the source documents particular works or products rather than the Aesthetic as a whole.

- **Surface** — In the one case opened, Cunard changed carpets, furniture and paint colours in a 1994 overhaul, with passengers expecting traditional design.
  - Evidence: Documented · Source attached · Claim: `kcc:surface-1` · Covers Cunard, QE2 overhaul 1994; one brand.
- **Form** — Heritage can be carried by three-dimensional design: Cunard's heritage strategy relied on ship interiors and a traditional exterior livery.
  - Evidence: Documented · Source attached · Claim: `kcc:form-1` · Covers Cunard only.

## Positions by area

The overall position recorded for each area. "No overall position recorded" means rules exist for the area but no position above them; the rules still apply. It is not the same as "Not established", which means nobody has researched the area.

- **Layout** — No overall position recorded
- **Typography** — Specified
- **Color** — Specified
- **Imagery** — Specified
- **Motion** — No overall position recorded
- **Motif** — Specified
- **Technique** — Specified

## Design grammar — web primitives

A starting grammar for a website in Heritage, kept short because Heritage is a positioning, not a visual language: serif capitals, a deep ground with engraved linework, engraving rather than photography, and a founding date only if it is true. Layout, surface, density and motion are open questions.

Three kinds of line: **On the record** names a rule this record holds (its wording is under Established rules) and states what it becomes on the web. **Web translation** is Aesthetary's choice for the web, derived from the rules it cites; change it if you have a reason, keep the cited rule. **Not specified by the source** means the research reached this but the sources say nothing about it; **Not researched yet** means the research has not reached it yet. Either way, follow the instruction and do not invent a rule. Structured version: `designGrammar` in data/heritage.json.

### Colour

| Role | Value | Contrast | Use | Kind |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| ground | `#14213A` | — | Deep navy, the page's ground. | Web translation |
| deep | `#0E1830` | — | The deeper navy inside frames and fields. | Web translation |
| text | `#EFE8D8` | 13.3:1 | Reading text and headings. | Web translation |
| gold | `#B08D3E` | 5.1:1 | Engraved linework and rules; small labels. | Web translation |
| stone | `#C9C2B0` | 9.5:1 | Secondary text. | Web translation |

- **On the record · From our catalogue entry** · `token_rule:color-5` → Set a deep navy or burgundy ground with engraved linework.
- **Not specified by the source** — The sources do not specify the exact navy, burgundy or gold. _Instead:_ These are the page's values, and the page shows only navy. A burgundy ground is equally on the record; use the brand's own value.

### Typography

Family: traditional serif capitals (the record); Prata and Petrona are this page's faces. Stack: `"Prata HT", "Times New Roman", serif`

| Role | Size | Weight | Line height | Case | Tracking | Measure | Use |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| display | clamp(2.25rem, 7vw, 5.5rem) | 400 | 1.05 | uppercase | 0.14em | — | Names and heads in serif capitals. |
| text | 1.1875rem | 300 | 1.75 | not specified | not specified | 60ch | Reading text, in Petrona. |

- **On the record · From our catalogue entry** · `token_rule:typography-4` → Set display in traditional serif capitals.
- **Web translation** — Use Prata for capitals and Petrona for reading. _Why:_ A traditional serif for the capitals the record asks for, and a plain serif to read at length. The faces are ours. (`token_rule:typography-4`)
- **On the record · Our reading** · `claim:failure-2` → Do not use a contemporary sans.

### Grid and layout

Not specified by the source. Whether heritage branding has an arrangement is an open question; the page's central axis is a choice.

Tokens: measure `60ch`

- **Not specified by the source** — Arrangement is an open question in the research. _Instead:_ The page sets everything on one central axis; that is our reading, not a requirement. Choose the layout the brand's material needs.
- **Not specified by the source** — Density is an open question in the research. _Instead:_ The page is generous and unhurried by choice; nothing evidences a density.
- **On the record · Our reading** · `token_rule:hierarchy-13` → If a device is used, rank by centrality and enclosure rather than size.

### Shape and geometry

Tokens: radius `0` · rule `1px solid #B08D3E`

- **On the record · From our catalogue entry · disputed / Our reading** · `token_rule:surface-8`, `claim:failure-3` → Use an armorial device or seal, and give it no gradient, gloss or bevel.
- **Not specified by the source** — Texture, material and grain are open questions in the research. _Instead:_ Do not add paper grain or wear to make it look old.
- **On the record · Our reading** · `claim:failure-6` → Never use stock heraldry that implies a lineage the subject does not have.

### Imagery

- **On the record · From our catalogue entry** · `token_rule:imagery-7` → Use engraving, not photography.
- **Not specified by the source** — The sources name engraving but supply none we may show: no licensed engraving is held. _Instead:_ Commission or license a real engraving. Do not trace period work or generate one and present it as engraved.

### The date

The one device the record says does the arguing. It is only as good as it is true.

- **On the record · Our reading** · `token_rule:he-r1` → Treat the founding date as the load-bearing device.
- **Web translation** — Print a date only if it is the subject's real founding year. _Why:_ The date carries the continuity claim; a false one spends credibility the register exists to borrow. (`token_rule:he-r1`, `claim:failure-6`)

### Where it is carried

Heritage names a positioning. In the one case opened it lived in interiors and a livery, not only in print.

- **On the record · Documented** · `claim:kcc:form-1` → Heritage can be carried by three-dimensional design: Cunard relied on ship interiors and a traditional exterior livery.
- **On the record · Documented** · `claim:kcc:surface-1` → In that case, carpets, furniture and paint colours were changed with passengers expecting traditional design.
- **Not specified by the source** — The sources name no single native medium: in the one case opened, heritage was carried across several. _Instead:_ Do not assume print. Carry the heritage through what the brand actually owns and uses.

### Components

Anatomy, tokens and states below are Web translation: Aesthetary's specification for the screen. Each value line after them says whether it restates a rule this record holds.

#### Button

A cream label in spaced serif capitals inside a single gold rule.

- Anatomy: 1px gold rule; label in Prata capitals, cream; navy ground
- Tokens: background `transparent` · color `#EFE8D8` · border `1px solid #B08D3E` · radius `0`
- State, default: Gold rule, cream label.
- State, hover: Underline beneath the label.
- State, focus: 2px cream outline, 4px outside.
- State, active: Label in gold.
- State, disabled: Dashed rule; the control says it is unavailable.
- Accessibility: Cream on navy at 13.3:1.
- Accessibility: At least 44px tall.
- **Web translation** — Set the label in traditional serif capitals. _Why:_ The record's one type rule, carried to the control. (`token_rule:typography-4`)
- **Not specified by the source** — The sources do not specify controls. _Instead:_ Keep the button plain. Do not add a crest, a seal or a gloss to it.

#### Card

A plain cartouche: a gold rule, the title in serif capitals, a line of text.

- Anatomy: 1px gold rule; title in Prata capitals; one line of Petrona
- Tokens: border `1px solid #B08D3E` · ground `#0E1830` · radius `0`
- State, default: Single gold rule.
- State, hover: Title underlined.
- State, focus: 2px cream outline outside the rule.
- Accessibility: The whole card is one link.
- Accessibility: No information is carried by the rule alone.
- **Web translation** — Frame the card in one gold rule on the deep ground. _Why:_ Deep ground with engraved linework is the record's colour rule; a rule is the plainest linework a screen has. (`token_rule:color-5`)
- **Not specified by the source** — The sources do not specify a card structure. _Instead:_ Keep it to title and text. Add engraving only if you hold a real one.

#### Input

A plain field on the deep ground with its label above in serif capitals.

- Anatomy: label above in Prata capitals; field ruled in stone; error in words beneath
- Tokens: border `1px solid #A79F8C` · focus-border `1px solid #EFE8D8` · background `#0E1830` · color `#EFE8D8` · radius `0` · height `2.75rem`
- State, default: Stone rule.
- State, focus: Cream rule and a 2px outline.
- State, error: A line beneath beginning "Error:", in cream.
- State, disabled: Dashed rule.
- Accessibility: The label is real text above the field.
- Accessibility: Errors are words, not colour.
- **Web translation** — Label fields in serif capitals. _Why:_ The record's type rule; the sources say nothing else about forms. (`token_rule:typography-4`)
- **Not specified by the source** — The sources do not specify forms. _Instead:_ Use an ordinary accessible field; do not dress it as a ledger.

#### Navigation

A row of spaced serif capitals on the deep ground; the current page underlined in gold.

- Anatomy: labels in Prata capitals, cream; current page: gold underline
- Tokens: color `#EFE8D8` · current `1px solid #B08D3E underline`
- State, default: Cream capitals.
- State, hover: Underline.
- State, focus: 2px cream outline.
- State, current: Gold underline.
- Accessibility: aria-current on the current page.
- Accessibility: Cream on navy at 13.3:1.
- **Web translation** — Set navigation in serif capitals. _Why:_ The record's type rule. (`token_rule:typography-4`)
- **Not specified by the source** — The sources do not say where navigation sits. _Instead:_ Centring it is a choice, not a requirement: arrangement is an open question.

### Motion

- **Not specified by the source** — Motion is an open question in the research. _Instead:_ The page is still by choice (our reading: motion dates a page to its year of making). Nothing evidences it either way.

### Deliberately not added

- **Exact values** (color): The record says deep navy or burgundy with engraved linework; the hex values are the page's.
- **Arrangement and density** (gridLayout): Open questions in the research. The central axis and the generous spacing are our reading.
- **Texture, material, grain** (shapeGeometry): An open question in the research.
- **Interface conventions** (components): The research record does not establish them. The four components are contemporary translations of documented rules.
- **Any position on motion** (motion): An open question. The page's stillness is our reading.
- **A visual language** (identity): The verdict: Heritage belongs at another layer. It is a brand positioning, carried by whatever the brand owns.

## Coverage — what has been looked at

One row per research dimension a research pass considered. "Not researched yet" (`UNKNOWN`) means exactly that; a dimension can carry an Aesthetary recommendation and still be unresearched, and those are different things.

| Research dimension | Evidence | Resolved by | Carries a rule |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Composition | Open question | Aesthetary decided | yes |
| Typography | Specified · From our catalogue entry | follows the recorded claim | yes |
| Hierarchy | Specified · Our reading | Aesthetary decided | yes |
| Colour | Specified · From our catalogue entry | follows the recorded claim | yes |
| Density | Open question | Aesthetary decided | yes |
| Imagery | Specified · From our catalogue entry | follows the recorded claim | yes |
| Form / motif / surface / technique | Not specified by the source: form · Specified: motif, technique · Open question: surface | follows the recorded claim | yes |
| Motion | Open question | Aesthetary decided | yes |

Unresearched: Composition, Density, Motion. Where a rule appears for one of these it is Aesthetary's implementation recommendation, not a property of the language, and its Evidence line above says so.

## Not researched yet

Nobody has established a position for this language on:

- Surface
- Interface
- Form

**Do not fill these in.** An absent position is absent research, not permission and not a blank for you to complete. If the work needs a decision in one of these areas, make it on other grounds and do not attribute it to this language.

## Grade your own work

24 checks: 9 mechanically testable, 13 needing a person to look, 0 needing a source Aesthetary does not hold, 2 with no recorded position. Scores do not add up. A failure against a required rule and a departure from something we invented are not the same result, and no total should let them cancel.

### Recognition — does this read as the intended Aesthetic?

- **[visual_human · recognition signature · Evidence: No grade recorded]** Strip every logo, word and borrowed image out of your work, then show it to someone who knows the collection. Do they land on this Aesthetic? The signature to hold is: A crest, seal or monogram device set with strict symmetry above a founding date, engraved or line-illustrated imagery in place of photography, and a deep saturated ground — navy, burgundy, forest — carrying traditional serif capitals with generous letterspacing. The diagnostic element is the date: it is the only device in the register that does the arguing, and everything else exists to make it credible. Gilded shares the symmetry and the dark ground but puts gold itself forward as the proposition and never dates itself. Institutional shares the navy and the conservatism but argues from present authority — a headshot grid and dense navigation — rather than from duration.
  - _If it fails:_ The work may be competent and still read as a different Aesthetic, or as none. Nothing below matters until this passes.

### Fidelity — are its defining rules present?

- **[unassessable · no recorded position · Evidence: Not researched yet (`UNKNOWN`)]** Nothing is recorded as a requirement of this Aesthetic. There is no rule here that your work must hold — which means nothing you do can fail this dimension, and nothing you do can satisfy it either. That is missing research, not freedom: our research brief does record failure modes to avoid, listed under avoidance below. They are recorded judgement, not requirements.
  - _If it fails:_ Not applicable. An empty dimension is an absence of research, never a pass and never a failure.

### Implementation — were those rules translated appropriately into this medium?

- **[visual_human · Our reading · Evidence: Our reading]** Your work may depart from this — but knowingly, not by accident. Symmetry about a central axis, because symmetry is the cheapest available signal of permanence and the crest device already demands it. We do not claim Heritage requires a symmetrical grid. We claim it uses a crest and a date; the axis is our reading.
  - _If it fails:_ Nothing. No one has researched the dimension yet, and this is only what Aesthetary would do. Departing from it costs you nothing.
- **[visual_human · From our catalogue entry · Evidence: From our catalogue entry]** Your work may depart from this — but knowingly, not by accident. Typography: traditional serif caps.
  - _If it fails:_ A defensible departure, and you should be able to say why you made it.
- **[visual_human · Our reading · Evidence: Our reading]** Your work may depart from this — but knowingly, not by accident. Rank by centrality and enclosure — the crest sits highest because it is centred and framed, not because it is largest.
  - _If it fails:_ A defensible departure, and you should be able to say why you made it.
- **[visual_human · From our catalogue entry · Evidence: From our catalogue entry]** Your work may depart from this — but knowingly, not by accident. Colour: deep navy or burgundy; engraved linework.
  - _If it fails:_ A defensible departure, and you should be able to say why you made it.
- **[visual_human · Our reading · Evidence: Our reading]** Your work may depart from this — but knowingly, not by accident. Generous and unhurried. Crowding reads as commercial urgency, which contradicts duration.
  - _If it fails:_ Nothing. No one has researched the dimension yet, and this is only what Aesthetary would do. Departing from it costs you nothing.
- **[visual_human · From our catalogue entry · Evidence: From our catalogue entry]** Your work may depart from this — but knowingly, not by accident. Imagery: engraving, not photography.
  - _If it fails:_ A defensible departure, and you should be able to say why you made it.
- **[visual_human · From our catalogue entry · disputed · Evidence: From our catalogue entry · disputed]** Your work may depart from this — but knowingly, not by accident. Form / motif / surface / technique: crest/seal; engraving.
  - _If it fails:_ A defensible departure, and you should be able to say why you made it.
- **[visual_human · Our reading · Evidence: Our reading]** Your work may depart from this — but knowingly, not by accident. Minimal to none. Motion dates a page to its year of making, which the negation explicitly refuses. This is a case where the correct native behaviour is almost no behaviour, and saying so is a real art-direction instruction rather than an absence.
  - _If it fails:_ Nothing. No one has researched the dimension yet, and this is only what Aesthetary would do. Departing from it costs you nothing.
- **[visual_human · Our reading · Evidence: Our reading]** Your work may depart from this — but knowingly, not by accident. The founding date is the load-bearing device. It is the only element that makes the continuity claim, and without it the register is generic traditional styling.
  - _If it fails:_ A defensible departure, and you should be able to say why you made it.

### Avoidance — known failure modes, neighbour drift, cloning

- **[mechanical · recorded failure mode · Evidence: No grade recorded]** Check your work against this: No photography.
  - _If it fails:_ A failure mode recorded in our research brief: recorded judgement about what weakens this Aesthetic, not a requirement of the language.
- **[mechanical · recorded failure mode · Evidence: No grade recorded]** Check your work against this: No contemporary sans.
  - _If it fails:_ A failure mode recorded in our research brief: recorded judgement about what weakens this Aesthetic, not a requirement of the language.
- **[mechanical · recorded failure mode · Evidence: No grade recorded]** Check your work against this: No gradient, gloss or bevel on the crest.
  - _If it fails:_ A failure mode recorded in our research brief: recorded judgement about what weakens this Aesthetic, not a requirement of the language.
- **[mechanical · recorded failure mode · Evidence: No grade recorded]** Check your work against this: No visible trend.
  - _If it fails:_ A failure mode recorded in our research brief: recorded judgement about what weakens this Aesthetic, not a requirement of the language.
- **[mechanical · recorded failure mode · Evidence: No grade recorded]** Check your work against this: No asymmetry in the primary lockup.
  - _If it fails:_ A failure mode recorded in our research brief: recorded judgement about what weakens this Aesthetic, not a requirement of the language.
- **[mechanical · recorded failure mode · Evidence: No grade recorded]** Check your work against this: No stock heraldry that implies a lineage the subject does not have.
  - _If it fails:_ A failure mode recorded in our research brief: recorded judgement about what weakens this Aesthetic, not a requirement of the language.
- **[visual_human · recorded failure mode · Evidence: No grade recorded]** Have you made any of these changes? Each one moves the work into a neighbouring Aesthetic: Against Gilded: the date, and gold as support rather than subject. Against Institutional (deprecated): duration versus present authority. Anti-signature: dropping the date and enlarging the gold makes it Gilded. Adding a headshot grid and dense navigation makes it Institutional. Both are one decision away.
  - _If it fails:_ You have built the neighbour. That may be fine — but name which Aesthetic you are in.
- **[mechanical · declared closure · Evidence: No grade recorded]** Check your work against this: Not open: removing the date.
  - _If it fails:_ This one is closed, not open. The record says generation must not go here.
- **[mechanical · declared closure · Evidence: No grade recorded]** Check your work against this: Not open: replacing engraving with photography.
  - _If it fails:_ This one is closed, not open. The record says generation must not go here.
- **[mechanical · declared closure · Evidence: No grade recorded]** Check your work against this: Not open: animating the.
  - _If it fails:_ This one is closed, not open. The record says generation must not go here.
- **[visual_human · neighbour drift · Evidence: No grade recorded]** Could your work be mistaken for Letterpress? That language is: The physical evidence of pressure; refined where Stamp & Ink is vernacular
  - _If it fails:_ Not necessarily wrong, but you are closer to Letterpress than to this Aesthetic.
- **[visual_human · neighbour drift · Evidence: No grade recorded]** Could your work be mistaken for Gilded? That language is: Gold as the whole proposition; risks reading as casino if handled loosely
  - _If it fails:_ Not necessarily wrong, but you are closer to Gilded than to this Aesthetic.

### Accessibility — the Aesthetic preserved without its inaccessible practice

- **[unassessable · no recorded position · Evidence: Not researched yet (`UNKNOWN`)]** Does this Aesthetic conflict with any usability floor? Nobody has recorded one for it.
  - _If it fails:_ Nothing — and that is the problem. An unrecorded conflict is not an absent one. Hold AA on reading matter and decide the rest on other grounds.

## Rules for the agent

1. Do not invent rules for any area listed under **Not researched yet**.
2. Do not treat an absent position as permission to do anything you like — say that the language has no position, and decide on other grounds.
3. Keep our interpretations separable from the language's own requirements. If asked to justify a choice, cite which kind of claim it came from.
4. If you need something this record does not contain, say so rather than producing a confident answer from the aesthetic's name.
5. When you self-score against "Grade your own work", score only checks marked `mechanical`. Declare `visual_human` and `evidence_dependent` checks unjudged rather than guessing, and never score an `unassessable` one.
6. Evidence "Not researched yet" (`UNKNOWN`) is never a failure. It means nobody researched the dimension, so departing from what is written there costs nothing and must not be reported as a defect. "No grade recorded" is not a grade either: do not treat it as our decision or as an outside source.
7. In **Design grammar**, a "Web translation" line is our choice for the web and may be changed with a reason; the rules it cites may not. Never present a translation as a property of the language.

## Provenance

- Record: `heritage` · status `draft` · research `not_researched`
- Full structured record: https://aesthetary.com/data/heritage.json
- Human-readable record: https://aesthetary.com/a/heritage.html
- This file is a snapshot. The record may have changed since; check the page above.

_Aesthetary is an alpha. Where a page says nothing, nobody has done the work yet._